By Richard, Kerry, Hess and others
This
article is written for people who worry that their 'original friend'
(or significant other, or family member) has left after a system have
come out to them, or are shy about engaging other members in the system
besides the one (or ones) perceived as their 'original friend'. It's
really written up for personal reasons, but the explanations are
general enough to share with others. This article is focussed on
friends and significant others, although family members can use it, too.
Situation
1a: The 'original friend' is really a composite of multiple people, and
simply adopted a 'singlet name' that belonged to a single person within
the group.
This
is what happened with most people who knew us as a singlet before.
Before we came out as plural, we used the name of someone who turned
out to be a specific person in the group. (This doesn't mean that there
is a 'main' or 'body' person, but that there just happens to be someone
who uses the name that the group used as a singlet.) After we came out,
they interpreted the person who happened to have the 'singlet identity
name' as the one they knew before, and assumed that they didn't know us
at all, when in reality, their 'old friend' was several writers and
speakers who were not aware that they were indeed separate. It was an
extremely rare occurrence for someone to only have spoken with the
person who they thought was the 'original friend'.
Admittedly,
this idea is difficult for some people to understand. (It was also
difficult for us to understand how they couldn't understand, which
caused us to misinterpret things in a way that seemed as though it was
torn from the pages of a Jane Austen novel.) They may feel deceived,
cheated or tricked. What they must remember is that the 'original
friend' is not gone, but happens to be more than one person who felt as
though they had to hide who they were because of reprisal, ostracism or
mere habit. It is not an easy idea to accept, certainly, but in order
to understand the collective better, then it is something that should
be understood.
Situation
1b: The 'original friend' is really a composite of multiple people, and
used a name that did not refer to any of the system's members.
The
advice given for Situation 1a applies to Situation 1b as well, with a
few differences: in situations in which it is safe to mention the
system's plurality, the 'collective singlet name' does not apply to any
of fronters. Use their own names: they'll appreciate it.
Situation 2: The 'original friend' really is a separate person, and the others really ARE new to you.
Talk
to the people with whom you may have things in common, and be polite to
everyone if they talk to you. That's the best advice we can give you.
This happened to us once, we believe, and although the situation was
initially difficult, it turned out to work marvellously at the end.
Perseverance and patience are important.
Situation
3: You've made friends with numerous people in a plural system, but
their fronting staff have changed, leaving several new people in their
place.
This
must be extremely difficult for people. We would simply be polite to
the new fronters and not 'demand' to talk to the old staff. You could
possibly ask about relaying messages to the unavailable fronters.
Although we haven't had any large staff changes lately, we do have a
few people who are more reluctant to front than others, and we take
dictation for those people and relay their messages.
Back to the Walkthrough